The Court That Gutted Itself to Serve a King
They’re softening the ground to make it easier to bury us later.
📢📢📢Readers: SOUND OFF: What’s your gut reaction to today’s SCOTUS ruling? Say it loud. Unfiltered.
This Supreme Court has effectively neutered itself—and the entire judicial branch—as a check on executive power.
Some of you might be wondering:
Why didn’t they go all in today? Why didn’t they unleash both the full injunction and take out birthright citizenship in one blow?
We know what Project 2025 lays out. We know their deadline is, well, 2025. So what gives?
Why this strategic brake-tapping? Why the theatrical restraint? Even Chief Justice Roberts has long supported a unitary executive, so this tactical hesitation doesn’t align with that vision… unless there’s something bigger at play.
And there is.
This isn’t retreat. It’s choreography.
Let’s eliminate some theories:
No, it’s not about military readiness.
No, it’s not that their systems aren’t in place—we know they are.
And no, it’s not internal resistance. At least not enough to slow this train.
Here’s my hypothesis:
They're building a thousand-year Reich, and that requires legality.
Not real legality—the perception of it.
If you're planning a slow coup that permanently resets the American project, you don’t rush. You normalize. You build procedural insulation so deeply entrenched that by the time anyone realizes what happened, the game is already over.
They’re playing the long con:
Let the courts appear independent—while hollowing them out from within.
Keep rights technically intact—while eroding how anyone can defend them.
Maintain the illusion of order—while kneecapping judicial remedies and due process.
They’re not aiming for chaos. They’re aiming for a seamless slide into authoritarianism, using legal tools like scalpels.
They don’t need to end your rights if they can just delete your ability to defend them.
John Roberts is the perfect surgeon for this operation.
Rather than expand executive power directly, he’s shrinking the judiciary’s scope so much that it can’t intervene—even when it wants to. No alarms go off. No tanks in the streets. Just slow, surgical narrowing of precedent.
And today’s decision?
It didn’t strike down birthright citizenship outright—yet. But it did limit how challenges can be brought against Trump and the regime. It did erode legal access. It did inch us closer to a state where rights only exist on paper and can be denied for simply “pissing off” the wrong people.
That’s not hyperbole. That’s a blueprint.
I’m well aware I probably have a one-way ticket to El Salvador lined up. One of the many queer, defiant, loudmouthed folks they’d love to disappear—shipped off to detention centers full of men who haven’t seen women in years.
This isn’t a win. It’s a pause. It’s tactical silence before the constitutional pivot.
This is the setup.
A softened terrain.
A battlefield prepped for a more favorable political climate, a juicier case, a more compliant media.
They’re not losing.
They’re not confused.
They’re not backing off.
They’re just delaying the strike until the target is standing still.
Why worry about eroding human rights when you just make it to where people can’t fight for them…
DENY, DEFEND, DEPOSE…
Liberté, Égalité, Solidarité
~~☘️ Ginge ☘️