🚰 Environment & Infrastructure as a Weapon: How Clean Water Became Ideological Enforcement
The pipes don’t run unless you prove your loyalty.
Onward: This is a continuation of what is truly in HR 1. All of this is weighed and balanced against Project 2025 as well as publicly available stated intentions of those departments' personnel so we can see through the language of that bill.
Personal note in the usual spot1
Where we’ve been so far:
Clusters 0-5
🚰 Environmental and Infrastructure Grant Conditioning
Welcome to the future where your town’s access to clean water, climate resilience, or basic transit depends on how well it pledges allegiance—biometrically and ideologically—to the state. This isn’t about sustainability; it’s about submission. From loan forgiveness to clean air, the lifelines of public infrastructure are now choke points of “civic alignment.” If your values don’t match theirs, you don’t get the pipes, the pumps, or the pavement.
This is where sustainability gets braided to surveillance—where access to climate resilience, utility upgrades, and clean infrastructure is conditional on biometric and ideological compliance.
🚰 “Civic Alignment” Requirement for Federal Student Loan Forgiveness
Change: Borrowers applying for forgiveness (e.g., PSLF) must affirm biometric and ideological compliance.
Stated Intent: “Ensure responsible use of taxpayer funds.”
Likely Implementation: DOE and OMB pilot in Indiana and Texas; tied to FAFSA and Harmony Score.
Backpedal Risk: Low. Quiet rollout; Kennedy has not opposed.
🚰 “Civic Alignment” Requirement for Federal Water Access Grants
Change: Municipalities must meet biometric and ideological compliance benchmarks to qualify for water infrastructure funding.
Stated Intent: “Ensure resilient and values-aligned infrastructure.”
Likely Implementation: EPA and HUD pilot in Arizona and Mississippi; tied to Harmony Score.
Backpedal Risk: Low. Quiet rollout; Kennedy has praised it as “hydrological integrity.”
🚰 “Civic Alignment” Requirement for Federal Transit Infrastructure
Change: Cities must meet biometric compliance benchmarks to qualify for new transit construction grants.
Stated Intent: “Build infrastructure that reflects national values.”
Likely Implementation: DOT pilot in Georgia and Arizona; tied to Harmony Score.
Backpedal Risk: Low. Quiet rollout; few public statements.
This is eco-fascism with a digital leash. Clean water, transit, broadband, even fucking air—now tied to whether you’re politically housebroken and plugged into a biometric loyalty matrix. It's not about helping communities; it's about filtering out the unaligned. If your town doesn’t bow, it dries up. Simple as that.
🚰 “Civic Alignment” Requirement for Federal Clean Water Act Compliance Grants
Change: Municipalities must meet biometric and ideological benchmarks to receive EPA compliance assistance.
Stated Intent: “Ensure environmental stewardship reflects national values.”
Likely Implementation: EPA pilot in Mississippi and Arizona; tied to Harmony Score.
Backpedal Risk: Low. Quiet rollout; Kennedy has praised it as “values-based environmentalism.”
🚰 “Civic Alignment” Requirement for Federal Clean Air Act Compliance Grants
Change: States must meet biometric and ideological benchmarks to receive EPA air quality enforcement support.
Stated Intent: “Ensure environmental stewardship aligns with national values.”
Likely Implementation: EPA pilot in Ohio and Georgia; tied to Harmony Score.
Backpedal Risk: Low. Quiet rollout; Kennedy has praised it as “air integrity.”
🚰 “Digital Behavior Score” for Federal Climate Resilience Grants
Change: Municipalities must meet digital behavior benchmarks to qualify for climate adaptation funding.
Stated Intent: “Promote responsible governance.”
Likely Implementation: FEMA and EPA pilot in coastal states; tied to Harmony Score.
Backpedal Risk: Low. Quiet implementation; few public statements.
📢📢📢SOUND OFF:
🗣️🗣️ If you had the mic in a public hearing on this, what would you say to their face?🗣️🗣️
🚰 “Civic Alignment” for Federal Transportation Jobs
Change: Applicants for DOT-funded roles (e.g., Amtrak, FAA) must affirm biometric and ideological compliance.
Stated Intent: “Ensure national cohesion in critical infrastructure.”
Likely Implementation: DOT and OPM pilot in Georgia and Ohio.
Backpedal Risk: Low. Quiet implementation; few public statements.
🚰 “Civic Alignment” Requirement for Federal Broadband Expansion Projects
Change: Municipalities must meet biometric compliance benchmarks to receive infrastructure funds.
Stated Intent: “Build digital infrastructure that reflects national values.”
Likely Implementation: FCC and DOT pilot in rural states; tied to Harmony Score.
Backpedal Risk: Low. Quiet rollout; few public statements.
[Upstream Alliance] is the most comprehensive safety net—Our path forward..
A tried and true way to get through all of this while eliminating the control measures the regime would use against us!!
We could finally have the [Great American Strike]!!
If this made you feel some kind of way ( any is valid, feel your feelings), made you think, or add to your armory against fascism—
Consider becoming a paid subscriber to support my work. I promise to never fear monger,—only present ideas with data, patterns, behavior to support. My goal is to be proactive and anticipate regime moves.
This isn't environmental policy—it's infrastructure weaponized to enforce ideological uniformity. The rollout is quiet, but the message is loud: compliance is now the cost of basic survival. And if clean air and water require biometric alignment, just imagine what your livelihood will demand.
Next cluster on deck: 💼 Employment and Workforce Screening Policies—where access to jobs, training, and even volunteerism is tied to ideology and biometric “readiness.”
DENY, DEFEND, DEPOSE…
Liberté, Égalité, Solidarité
~~☘️ Ginge ☘️
MY APOLOGIES FOR THE TARDINESS OF THE ARTICLE!!
Got almost done with the article this morning… I was about to finalize it and that’s when it hit me that I was on the wrong one!!! I was working on tomorrow's article . These are meant to be a certain order as this is a postmortem done in advance.. Can’t present it skipping steps.
The good news is tomorrow's is the last in the core structure of this monster. All that’s being piloted or implemented in some way.
The next clusters are going to demonstrate real situations were the implementation of HR1 is fully applied.
I honestly don’t believe we should expect anything in the realm of climate science in regard to the EPA or the federal government controlling our water or air. They don’t think it’s real and it will be easy to simply cancel all programs related to this issue. If it don’t exist, you don’t need it.